Recently, there are many people who use smartphones. Many people have the right to freedom of communication. Freedom of communication is the right of the people to freely use communication means such as letters, telegrams and telephones. However, there are phenomena in which this right is abused. I have a cheat problem using a mobile phone in a recent exam. There are also phenomena such as wire fraud on mobile phones at financial institutions. In many halls, it’s common to see your phone ringing and obstructing viewing. It is necessary to promote public welfare, such as ensuring quietness in a specific space, in order to prevent annoyance due to ringtones from smartphones. Allows installation and operation of cell phone jammer.
Out-of-range devices that interfere with radio waves from smartphones, etc. are attracting attention as special devices that cannot be used within a certain area. This equipment is installed with care so as not to impair communication freedom. The right to use mobile phones, etc., the right to prevent inconvenience caused by communication using mobile phones, etc. It seems that these two are in direct conflict, so it is not clear. The freedom to use mobile phones seems to be an important right for individuals, and it can be said that the use of jammers leads to public welfare.
At the same time as the right to use freedom of communication, it is important to bother others. Don’t violate the rules. Using a mobile phone for college entrance exams violates the rules. We cannot guarantee the impartiality of the exam. It may also damage the rights of others. Therefore, it is justified to install a deterrent device to prevent cheating. This is an effective method. It is legitimate to install this wifi jammer in public places to prevent annoying ringtones from mobile phones. This is the maintenance of public welfare. Utilizing high quality communications can be nearly impossible. This is also within the control of the facility manager and is not related to the freedom of communication.